Well to be fair, the anti-monopoly system is only effective against the companies taking over the whole market.
However, shareholders are not limited in any way.
This means that mr. X (figure of speech) can own 40+% of lets say 3 out of 5 mega companies.
So with the majority of shares in his hands (either direct or indirect) mr. X still controls the global market....
And through that position more is achievable, such things happen. Real life examples are the Rothschild family.
Some shocking details about this particular family:
-Family was involved in mass castration/sterilization projects in US(estimated 1930's)/Nazi Germany(1934-1942)/Russia (during Stalin's reign)
-Holds vast shares of almost all major companies
-Owns the world bank
-Owns the "federal reserve" (America's private bank controlling the US dollar)
-Has an estimated worth of $490.000.000.000.000.000,- (this is roughly 40-50% of the money in circulation world wide)
-Has been known to willingly bankrupt whole countries
-On many occasions indirectly influences politics
-Finances most of the ongoing conflicts in the world area's with OIL and GAS
Some say he is forming/has formed a new world order, others seem to fear he will become the first financial dictator of the world.
I do not have ample information on these details, but it is an unhealthy situation if you have 1 family with the power to buy most of the known world.
As for the part about current governments:
-All systems work through fear
-In our democracy's we receive a small benefit for compliance
-Most crimes and problems are judged by a more or less objective party
-There is a forced social system in place just like in an dictatorship, to keep "peace"
-Money is the primary means to the end, this is not always true for a dictatorship
-People have more input for smaller laws then in a dictatorship
-Freedom of speech is still possible in some democracy's , however America lost this 4 years back. England and the Netherlands are losing it as we speak.
(as both England and the Netherlands are currently preparing multiple legislation, for homeland security, enabling more invasive measures to privacy, that also open doors to oppression)
How do they get us all to agree to STUPID LAWS, THAT STEAL FROM US ? :
The system used is an old one. First they will instill a state of fear in the masses.
A nice example was the (alleged) Terrorist attack on the WTC and in Barcelona.
Shortly after this happened, the Terrorists where engaged in guerrilla warfare with most of the western world.
This provoked them to send out threats to most know allies.
After receiving those threats, we were spammed by the movies , clips and images of impending doom and destruction.
Then many terrorists and sympathizers where arrested in the western world.
(this had to go somewhere ...... do you see this coming ? )
The Echelon project (US/CIA project) , that was already monitoring all our data, was not yet updated but readily listening.
Soon our European parliament/Ministers started to work on legal solutions to ensure our safety.
The people supported them, thinking it would keep them safe and happy.
Due to this some of the most harsh and dangerous laws where passed, things we would have never allowed if we were not first scared.
-The Echelon project was renamed and updated to multiple locations , with antenna array's all over Europe, and internet data logging stations on multiple sites.
-Approval was given to store all phone traffic for 6 months, this is all telephone data.
-Approval was given to store all internet traffic for 6 months (though the provider only has to save 2 months)
-CCTV camera's where updated with facial recognition software (greatly impeding privacy, since they can track you every where)
-All banking data is now saved, and can be requested by governments, amounts exceeding a certain cash amount are automatically "Red Flagged"
(so its no longer your business what you do with your money)
-Terrorists/ suspected terrorists are now allowed to be detained indefinitely (and in the US even without trial, and some others are passing similar legislation)
-All people who board transports to north/middle America are reported by the airline (Yes if you go to Mexico, then England and the US get a file about you, and store it)
-All passports where updated to have Biometrics on them , they say to prevent illegal ones being made (strange that the plans where made 7 months after the biometrics introduction in CCTV surveillance)
- In England, US , The Netherlands, Germany, and some pieces of France, the road "safety" camera's are now linked to the registry, and have number plate recognition, in theory and practice able to match cars with drivers. They say this was done to find criminals and people who do not pay road tax. (so why not only log / look for those license plates , but all? )
-Active supporters of certain human rights organizations/political parties , are now actually being logged in a central data base. (the US is further along, and also logs affiliates, matches them with all online traffic from their address and saves all in a digital case file and risk analysis)
All those rules where allowed by us/not really apposed , because we thought a few terrorists would be worse !?
Come to think of it..... are they?
Is it maybe ending up in a different form of dictatorship?
Or is it likely i am over concerned with my privacy getting diminished to the point of no return?
Also don't forget that in the US there are now test cases with RF chips for "Obama care" and a few big Banks.
Claiming it is safer to carry your money / personal identification and medical data on you in a chip.
Sure , you cant lose it, and it wont be easily stolen.
But at the same time, such an chip can be read from no more than 70 meters with an medium powered antenna.
So we are pretty safe, should we live in a bunker....... Imagine for a moment , that you for some reason are walking to the store, and they would happen to install such functions on the
same communications masts as the current G2/G3 phone array's?
In theory, they would know how healthy you are, the amount of money you have, who you are and to finish it off they would be able to track you all day long.
Now that might feel safe, since if something happens, you know they also know.
But what if you for some reason are protesting against the government, and they just so happen to ERASE all data on the chip......
How much problems would you have then ? And if they refuse to reset is...... then you simply seize to exist.
Or if they want to arrest you ? They will know where you are , all day and night. Cool for catching a real criminal, but it can be used for other things.
Now the US is by default the starting/testing grounds for the most invasive measures we have seen so far.....
If they can sell it to their population, then we are next.
And as long as they can scare the masses into this , sweet talking about the positives and twisting around the negatives.... they can.....
So as you can see above, these things passed because of the fear we had of Terrorists....
Imagine what they could do if there would be a full scale ware between ISIS and the west..... would we pass on our freedom as well then ?
Please do not take my word for any of this, and research it before you post
The name of the game is FEAR
Easy 3 step system proven by multiple trials:
-Make them AFRAID
-Give them a COMMON ENEMY
-offer them a SOLUTION
(seems familiar right ? , yup think of NAPOLEON/HITLER/STALIN/KIM JON IL/MAO)