Well after a few more plays I am finding the combat to be more intresting than in Civ IV, the inability to stack units changes a lot of dynamics... as does the way the cities can bombard enemies instead of the default ' no unit in that city, too bad ' issue you had in Civ IV, you got to beat the cities down before you can claim it.
It is easier to maintain your lands as the border growth isnt so insane, so its relatively easy to keep up with the need to improve your lands without resorting to automating the task.
Last game I had , had Germany going to war with Dublin right next to my borders... and as I didnt fancy having Germany control a city state right on my border I waited till Germany had commited a sizable force to taking Dublin , then I backstabbed him... rolled in warriors to break his catapults, rained arrows onto his warriors.
A few short turns later and his mighty assault force was reduced to some archers cowering in Dublins nearby mines while my archers where able to target them at leisure, Bismark was really generous in his offer of peace... gold flowed, he opened his borders, a tribute of gold was tossed in and he made peace with Dublin as well.
... I used the gold he offered to buy up tiles near his borders
